In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India, in the case of Shankar
Lal Sharma v. Rajesh Koolwal & Ors., highlighted the vital role that young
advocates can play in guaranteeing that everyone, especially the poor, has
access to justice. The Court emphasized that lawyers that are also known
as social engineers in some theories have an obligation to help those in
need and that the legal profession is a service to society rather than just a
business.
The case was a long-running conflict between the respondent firm,
represented by Rajesh Koolwal, and the petitioner, Shankar Lal Sharma, a
73-year-old man with low vision and several other conditions. The
petitioner had been defending himself in the case since he was having
trouble understanding complicated legal procedures. On November 18,
2022, the Supreme Court designated Advocate Sanchar Anand as an
Amicus Curiae to support the petitioner due to the nature of the case.
KEY LEGAL ISSUES
The Supreme Court tackled several critical legal issues, using its judgment
to underscore the vital role young lawyers can play in ensuring access to
justice, particularly through pro bono work. The Court recognized the
significant challenges faced by individuals representing themselves in
court, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds who often lack the
resources and expertise to navigate complex legal procedures. Therefore,
the Court emphasized the importance of encouraging young advocates to
offer free legal aid, ensuring that everyone, regardless of their financial
situation, has access to competent legal representation. Furthermore, the
Court highlighted the value of promoting alternative dispute resolution
(ADR) mechanisms, such as mediation and conciliation, as effective tools
for resolving conflicts outside of the traditional court system, potentially
leading to faster and more amicable outcomes.
- Legal profession as a service :
Citing State of UP vs. UP State Law Officers Association, the Court
declared that the legal profession is a service to society rather than just a
business. businesses that are solely focused on making money. It is
required of lawyers to help make sure that everyone, not just the wealthy,
can access the legal system. - Encouraging young advocates:
The Court encouraged young attorneys to offer their services pro bono to
assist individuals who lack the means for legal representation, highlighting
that justice should not be determined by one’s financial status.
Recognizing the frequently overwhelming costs associated with legal
processes, the ruling underscored the necessity for increased legal aid
resources. - Alternate Dispute Resolution:
The Court advocated for mediation and conciliation, especially in labor
and family disputes, as efficient ways to resolve conflicts outside of court,
leading to faster, more amicable, and tailored solutions.
DECISION OF THE COURT :
Recognizing the importance of ensuring petitioners’ fate and access to
justice, the Supreme Court appointed Sanchaananda’s lawyers as Krai’s
friend in support of petitioners. After numerous hearings, the court
promoted friendly regulations between the parties, and the respondent
company agreed to pay 20 gaps as a full and final resolution of all
complaints. The court also ordered that a fee of 1 lakh ₹ was paid to
defend Sanchar Anand for his dedicated service.
IMPACT OF THE RULING:
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Shankar Lal Sharma v. Rajesh Koolwal &
Ors. It serves as a reminder of the ethical and social obligations of the
legal profession. He encourages young lawyers to contribute to society,
provides legal support to those in need, and contributes to access to justice
for all. The decision also highlights the importance of ADR mechanisms in
conflict resolution. Supreme court said young lawyers to help poor to ensure justice
Author
Akshita Garg is a career driven law student at Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi, blending analytical precision with a passion for justice. With a foundation in Botany from Hansraj College, she brings a unique perspective to legal research and advocacy. Her experience spans legal drafting, research, and social impact initiatives, gained through internships at leading firms and NGOs. Known for her critical thinking and effective communication, she is committed to navigating the complexities of law to drive meaningful change.
