Popular YouTuber Ashish Chanchlani has approached the Guwahati High Court in search of anticipatory bail after an FIR became registered towards him through the Guwahati Police. The case stems from his participation in India’s Got Latent, a YouTube display hosted by comedian Samay Raina, where he and other guests allegedly engaged in obscene and sexually specific discussions. The legal conflict has intensified as multiple YouTubers locate themselves amid a growing controversy over online content material and its ethical and prison boundaries.
- The Beginning of the Controversy
The controversy erupted after a specific episode of India’s Got Latent aired on YouTube, proposing a panel of famous virtual creators, along with Ashish Chanchlani, Ranveer Allahbadia (BeerBiceps), Jaspreet Singh, Apoorva Mukhija, and host Samay Raina.
During the display, Ranveer Allahbadia posed a noticeably arguable query to a contestant:
“Would you alternatively watch your mother and father have sex every day for the rest of your lives or be a part of it as soon as to make it safe for all time?”
This specific and disturbing question speedy caught the eye of viewers. The different panelists, including Ashish Chanchlani, had been seen laughing and tasty within the conversation, which many found to be tremendously beside the point and offensive.
As the clip circulated on-line, public outrage grew hastily, leading to sizable criticism of the YouTubers’ behavior and their lack of sensitivity toward this sort of sensitive subject matter. The backlash became so extreme that Samay Raina had to delete the video from his YouTube channel. However, the harm had already been achieved, and criminal outcomes soon followed.
- Legal Trouble: FIR and Charges Filed
On February 10, 2025, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma publicly introduced that the Guwahati Police had registered an FIR in opposition to the YouTubers for allegedly promoting obscenity and attractiveness in vulgar discussions. The case became primarily based on a criticism filed by way of Alok Boruah, a resident of Assam, who observed the content material as exceptionally offensive and inappropriate.
- Laws Invoked within the FIR
The Guwahati Crime Branch booked the accused YouTubers under multiple laws and prison provisions, along with:
1. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023
Section 79 – Insulting the modesty of a woman.
Section 95 – Hiring, employing, or engaging a toddler in an offense.
Section 294 – Sale, distribution, or move of obscene materials.
Section 296 – Obscene acts and songs.
2. Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000
Section 67 – Publishing or transmitting obscene cloth electronically.
3. Cinematograph Act, 1952
Regulates the content material of movies and virtual structures.
4. Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986
Prohibits the indecent portrayal of girls in any shape.
- Police Investigation and Strict Warnings
Guwahati Joint Police Commissioner Ankur Jain confirmed that the police had initiated research into the problem. Speaking to the media, he said:
“We have obtained an FIR explaining how these YouTubers made inappropriate feedback about their family relationships in an obscene manner. The content material they produced and broadcasted on YouTube is deeply offensive, and we can take the strictest possible motion in o
The police are presently figuring out all involved events, with unique recognition on:
Samay Raina, the display’s host ,Ranveer Allahbadia, who made the controversial observation,Ashish Chanchlani and other panelists, who engaged in the discussion
with the investigation gaining momentum, Ashish Chanchlani determined to transport to the Guwahati High Court for anticipatory bail, fearing viable arrest about the case.
- Public Reactions: Divided Opinions
The controversy has sparked a heated debate approximately content regulation, free speech, and the duties of online creators and also about support for the YouTubers.
Many people, inclusive of fellow digital creators, have come forward to support the accused YouTubers, arguing that:
Comedy has to not be censored – Humor frequently pushes boundaries, and while a few can also discover it offensive, others won’t.
Freedom of expression is at stake – If content material creators are punished for jokes, it can set a risky precedent without spending a dime on speech in India.
The audience has a desire – Viewers aren’t pressured to watch such content, and YouTube already has content regulations and age filters in location.
- Criticism Against the YouTubers
On the other side, many have condemned the lack of duty proven by those influencers, mentioning that:
‘The shaggy dog story crossed the road’ – Discussions related to the circle of relatives relationships and sexual content material ought to be treated with adulthood and sensitivity.
YouTubers impact hundreds of thousands – With a large following of younger viewers, these influencers should be greater careful about their content material.
Digital systems need stricter recommendations – This incident has raised worries about the lack of guidelines for online content creators, specifically in India.
- Government and Legal Experts Weigh In
Several criminal specialists trust that this case may want to set a crucial precedent concerning how online content is monitored and managed. If the court docket rules in favor of the prosecution, it may mean stricter regulations and penalties for YouTubers and digital creators in the future.
On the other hand, if the case is brushed off as an overreaction, it’d improve the argument that digital content has to continue to be free from government interference.
- The Road Ahead: Legal Proceedings and Implications
As of now, Ashish Chanchlani’s legal team is looking ahead to the Guwahati High Court’s choice on his anticipatory bail plea.
- Possible Outcomes
1. If anticipatory bail is granted:
- He will no longer be arrested but will ought to cooperate with the investigation.
- The case will proceed, however he will stay free even as protecting himself legally.
2. If anticipatory bail is denied :
- He may want to face immediate arrest and further questioning.
- The investigation would possibly make it bigger, bringing greater YouTubers under scrutiny.
- Larger Implications for Digital Content Creation
This case is not pretty much Ashish Chanchlani—it has large implications for all digital content material creators in India. The outcome could:
- Influence future content material regulation policies on YouTube and different structures.
- Set felony obstacles for what’s considered “ideal” content material in online entertainment.
- Impact how comedians, influencers, and YouTubers method touchy topics within the destiny.
- Conclusion: A Defining Moment for Online Content Regulation
The Ashish Chanchlani case is in the middle of a bigger debate about freedom of expression and the responsibility of digital creators. While humour and satire have constantly been part of leisure, this incident increases an essential query:
> Where has the line been drawn between comedy and offensive content?
With the Guwahati High Court now involved, the decision in this example will shape the destiny of digital content regulation in India. Whether it is consequences in stricter laws for content material creators or a reaffirmation of free speech rights, the outcome is certain to have a way-attaining effect on India’s booming digital enjoyment industry.
For now, all eyes are on the prison court cases and the Guwahati High Court’s verdict, because the case continues to unfold within the coming weeks.
Varsha, a socially conscious and driven law student from Nashik,maharashtra who believes in justice, equality, and policy reforms for a better society. She is analytical, solution-oriented, and committed to creating positive change through legal and ethical means.
